Category Archives: current events

America’s Descent into Chaos: Guilty of Insurrection…….. or Not?

Wikipedia notes that in the United States “Equality before the law, also known as equality under the law, equality in the eyes of the law, legal equality, or legal egalitarianism, is the principle that all people must be equally protected by the law.[1] The principle requires a systematic rule of law that observes due process to provide equal justice, and requires equal protection ensuring that no individual nor group of individuals be privileged over others by the law.”

In reference to the recent Colorado decision on Trump’s participation in the January 6th attempt to overthrow the election the judge “allowed Donald Trump to remain on the ballot in the state’s election next year, but found that he “engaged in insurrection” by sparking the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters.”

The ruling from Judge “rejects a bid by a group of Colorado voters to disqualify Trump under a rarely used amendment to the U.S. Constitution that bars officials who have engaged in “insurrection” from holding federal office.”

“The judge found that, as president, Trump was not “an officer of the United States” that could be disqualified under the amendment.”

Medicynical Noter: This ruling is certain to be appealed but remember Trump is the guy who once said in 2016 “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.”

On January 6th 2021 he stood in the middle of the Capital Mall and actually did his best to shoot his Vice President (verbally at least) and skewer the constitution. So far he’s getting away with it thanks to a politicized legal system which is paralyzed by money, infinite motions, and biased compromised judges even at the highest level.

One would think that no one is above the law. Maybe, but apparently not now in the United States. Kind of pathetic.

Leading Cause of Accidental Deaths of Children in the US? GUNs

I guess the founders, in their wisdom, as interpreted by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and others have achieved their finest hour. We have guns available literally everywhere, for everyone.

Their crowning achievement however is that gun deaths are now the leading cause of childhood accidental deaths in the United States. No other industrialized country can make this claim.

Medicynical Note: I’m sure the writers of the constitution in the era of the flint lock rifle did not anticipate handy little Berettas and Glocks or the world of UZIs and AK47’s. Our Supreme Court in their wisdom believes the founders would approve of easy access by literally everyone to those weapons. And now American children bear the consequences.

Meanwhile those same Supreme Court Justices claim they need more protection from protesters who march near their homes because one might be carrying those same handy murderous weapons that are killing our kids.

America is an amazing place.

Covid and Political Party Affiliation: More Republican Deaths, not a surprise

Since the start of the pandemic of COVID republicans have viewed with skepticism the protective measures, masking, social isolation and vaccination. In a recent JAMA article there is a limited accounting of the butcher’s bill.

Medicynical Note: When new diseases emerge it takes time to develop data on the best ways to prevent them. Looking for political advantage and not wanting to inconvenience businesses, republicans, rather than adopting best practices, opposed them—forgoing masking, isolation and vaccination.

Instead, they recommended use of unproven medications (hydroxychloroquin and Ivermectin for example). Republicans believed they were miracle treatments despite there being no evidence of efficacy.

In this JAMA study the epidemiologists concluded: “Our study found evidence of higher excess mortality for Republican voters compared with Democratic voters in Florida and Ohio after, but not before, COVID-19 vaccines were available to all adults in the US. These differences in excess death rates were larger in counties with lower vaccination rates.”

I note with sadness that my local republican state representative Doug Ericksen, who opposed vaccination, died of COVID.

Prostitute Reclaims Virginity: America’s “Equality”

From the Washington Post, American “equality” continues to evolve.

“Edward Blum, whose lawsuit prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the use of racial preferences in college admissions, targeted the Fearless Fund in early August, claiming it engaged in “explicit racial exclusion” by operating a grant program “open only to Black females.” The lawsuit — which asked the court to prevent the fund from selecting its next round of grant winners — is one of the most prominent in a flurry of recent lawsuits and legal claims by conservative activists aimed at applying the Supreme Court’s insistence on race-blind college admissions practices to the corporate sphere of hiring, contracting and investment.”

Medicynical Note: America is like the proverbial prostitute who after many years on the street decides that after all she is a virgin.

America had 300 years of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow, and separate but unequal laws that were aided and abetted by it’s legal system, including its (not so) Supreme Court and “constitution.” Now with incredible chutzpah, America piously claims that the past was a mulligan and and that we are henceforth pious vestal virgins and everyone shall be treated equally.

This self righteousness goes to the extreme that several states and one political party oppose teaching the history of slavery, segregation and racism and all their horrors. They even tout the “benefits” of slavery.

Its a little like a 300 year foot race during which some of the competitors are required to wear 20lb weights around their necks. At the end of 300 years the racers are then told the they had to continue racing from where ever they finished the previous race but that henceforth they would be able to proceed without the 20 lb weights…….. and we’ll call it being equal.

Unbelievable.

Is an Erroneous Belief Enough to Justify the Overthrow of an Election

John Eastman the former dean of the Chapman School of Law (ranked 109th in the country) maintains to this day that he thinks Trump won the election. This despite over 60 court cases that ruled otherwise.

Medicynical Note: With the conflicts of interest and politicization at every judicial level this guy, a former law school dean, is symbolic of the corruption of America’s legal system and a zealot’s infinite capacity for self delusion. Unless these clowns are convicted, fined and maybe jailed, America’s once proud democracy is likely finished.

Their goal was the overthrow of the government. In other countries they’d be in jail and/or banned from elective office already. Here they are continuing to plot, aided and abetted by a compromised incompetent judiciary.

Tell me I’m I’m wrong.

A Game Texas (and the Republican Party) Wants America to Forget

Americans have a type of amnesia. It’s called white washing. We do our best to forget unpleasant historic facts. And in this Texas leads the country.

Read this recent obituary of an early African-American college player, C. R. Roberts from U.S.C., whose team went to Texas, yes the famous University of Texas, for a game…… that Texas want America to forget.

Medicynical Note: This didn’t happen in 1619. It happened in my lifetime. It’s the way we were.

The Civil Rights movement changed America for the better but it didn’t erase history or remove the profound effects of hundreds of years of racism. Like it or not it’s our history.

Guns Everywhere: The Supreme Court’s Vision

There is no safe place in America. This July 4th weekend up to the morning of the fourth, 15 people died. This year between January and May 13,900 people died in gun violence.

“There have been more than 550 mass killings since 2006, according to the AP/US Today database, in which at least 2,900 people have died and at least 2,000 people have been injured.”

Among those events have been shootings at schools, concerts, graduations, super markets, movie theaters, parades, restaurants, night clubs, etc, etc, etc,

The mass shooting numbers don’t include the now legal category of people shooting others because they thought they were being threatened. The other person could be unarmed, without intent to cause harm or threaten but because the shooter felt he was being threatened there was a chance for acquittal of all charges.

You may recall Travon Martin the youth going home from a local store in Florida who was chased and abused by a man following him. When he faced the man and acted to force the guy to stop his abuse, he was shot and the man later cleared of all charges. Legalized murder,

No one is safe.

Medicynical Note: And in all, our erudite scholarly originalist dominated Supreme Court benignly approves of guns everywhere for everyone—except of course the demonstrators near their home. Somehow believing this was what the founders had in mind. And our pathetic congress remains it’s ineffective self, benignly looking elsewhere in hopes of being non-controversial. Not wanting to offend the gun lobby.

We’ve failed.

Supreme Court Returns to its Racist Roots….. Nothing New Here

America according the lyrics by Big Bill Broozy

“What you gonna do about the old Jim Crow?
Now if you was white, should be all right
If you was brown, could stick around
But if you black, whoa brother, git back git back git back”

And so the conservative, oh so pious republican appointees on the Supreme Court affirmed Big Bill’s observation in it’s ruling on Affirmative Action.

The ruling ignored our history of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation and white’s only advantages for 250 years and declared that “magically” America has done away with the lasting multi-generational effects of our history, which they also no longer wish to acknowledge or for that matter include in our history.

Justice Ketanji Jackson Brown’s dissent puts it into the correct historical and legal perspective.

Regulation? Essential for Safety

A tragedy, in part because of resistance to regulation. A couple of years ago Boeing fudged the oversight of the FAA on the construction of a new 737 version, the max. Two of their brand spanking new jets crashed killing hundreds.

And this week, in an industry with even less interest in regulation, 5 people perished in part because of a flaw in a deep sea exploration vessel. One of the innovators of this vessel felt that regulation inhibited innovation— he died with the others on the vessel.

Medicynical Note: Innovation and the need to turn a quick profit without safety rails can be fatal. In deregulated America, safety is apparently a secondary concern, it revenue that counts. But in rushing innovation without oversight mistakes pile up and people die.

Maybe our republican billionaire libertarian friends need to rethink their distain of regulation.

Harlan Crow and “Friend$hip,” Judicial Ethic$— The new Oxymorons

When I was a government employee we were instructed to avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest. At that time we couldn’t even accept payment for a meal, much less vacations and monetary gifts of any kind.

So it without risk of contradiction to say that there is an order of magnitude difference between the situation Justice Thomas and other Supreme Court Justices and the long accepted norms noted above.

Crow, after providing support in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to a sitting Supreme Court Justice (Thomas) refuses to discuss this relationship.

Medicynical Note: Harlan Crow, didn’t know Justice Thomas before Thomas became a justice. But since that time Thomas and his wife have received direct and indirect monetary payments and other benefits (free private flights and luxurious vacations) from Crow and I would presume others. In dollars Crow’s contributions are valued at over a million dollars.

And just what did Crow receive in return? Yes the citizen’s United decision which Thomas supported allows the Crows and other wealthy individuals to give unlimited dollars to influence political campaigns (a form of legalized bribery)….. but are monetary gifts to judges bribery? And just how much in contributions and other emollients is bribery? Just where is the line? And how should the recipient behave when his benefactor has business before the court?

In any case, Thomas became a reliable vote for whatever issue Crow considered important….. and also issues that his very politically active wife (who also received payments) supported. Should Thomas have recused himself from some these contentious cases?— he didn’t.

Just how corrupt is the current Supreme Court? Are judicial ethics a new disgraceful oxymoron?