Category Archives: General Cynicism

Climate Change Opposition Groups–The New Flat Earth Society

1. How can you convince these people that global warming is a threat. Their view is that global warming, and everything else, is god’s will.

That’s probably 30% of the opposition to trying to control global warming.

2. Another 30% of the opposition comes from financial concerns. Fixing global warming will hurt their bottom line and cost them money so they oppose.

3. A third group is simply politically motivated. If there is possible political gain they will oppose anything, just on that basis. Damn the facts, it’s politics as usual.

4. The last and perhaps most damning group is the “it’s a conspiracy” crowd. Who simply don’t believe what’s happening in spite of clear documentation. They buy disinformation, believe there is a conspiracy to take their “freedom” to do whatever they please. They are the rebirth of the Know Nothing movement and believe in American exceptionalism. We should be able to do what we want because of who we are. How do you argue against “it’s my birthright”? It’s not!!

Medicynical note: How does this relate to health care? These is great overlap between the groups opposing the notion of global warming and those opposing health care reform.

More here in this worldwide editorial


Church Opposition to Health Care Reform

The Catholic Church likes to lecture on morality and thinks for some reason that abortion in any form is immoral, even in cases of incest and rape. Rather than lecture others they need to review their own sordid history. As noted here:

  • “ROMAN Catholic archbishops in Dublin obsessively covered up widespread sexual abuse of children by priests until the mid-1990s, a report commissioned by the Irish government and released today found.
  • “One priest admitted abusing more than 100 children. Another said he had abused children every two weeks for more than 25 years, it said.”
  • “All archbishops in charge over the 1975-2004 period covered by the inquiry were aware of some complaints and the archdiocese was pre-occupied with protecting the reputation of the Church over and above protecting children’s welfare, the report said.”

Medicyical note: Religious hypocrisy is not an oxymoron.


Direct to Consumer Ads–the New Health Hucksters

This from McClatchy (Seattle Times). More in the NEJM here.


Note the increase in prescription spending between 1999 and 2009; their excess profits; and contributions to political campaigns.

Drug companies spend more on marketing and advertising than research the result is price increases:

  • “By the end of 2005, the cost to taxpayers for a Plavix prescription filled by a Medicaid patient rose 25 percent beyond the more modest rate of inflation that would have been expected before advertising began.”

Medicynical Note: Only the U.S. and New Zealand allow such ads. They should be stopped as they are misleading and costly. Alternatively, advertisers should disclose all side effects and costs/month of the medication along with a standardized disclosure of efficacy and the fact that alternative approaches are available.


More on Medical Bankrupcy–A Uniquely American Institution

The NY Times reports on bankruptcy due to medical debt.

  • “Harvard researchers published a headline-grabbing paper that concluded that illness or medical bills contributed to 62 percent of bankruptcies in 2007, up from about half in 2001. More than three-fourths of those with medical debt had health insurance.”
  • “At the bankruptcy court in Nashville, lawyers provided a spectrum of estimates for the share of cases in Middle Tennessee where medical debt was decisive, from 15 percent to 50 percent. But many said they felt the number had been growing, and might be higher than was obvious because medical bills are often disguised as credit card debt.”

Medicynical Note: Only in America!


Drug Pricing and Health Care Reform

Interesting take on drug prices in Health affairs blog– http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/24/drug-prices-and-health-reform/ –Donald Light commenting on his article Global Drug Discovery: Europe Is Ahead” noted:

  • “Europe outperformed the United States and also significantly increased its productivity of NMEs (new molecules) per billion invested. Regarding critical new drugs that are first in class, Europe and the United States were about even, but this means that U.S productivity decreased substantially and Europe productivity increased, as shown in Exhibit 4 of the article.”

He also observes:

  • “European countries have also signaled more strongly that companies will be rewarded for significantly better drugs but not for marginally better ones, while U.S. purchasers tend to pay high prices for marginally better drugs as well as good ones. Although the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the industry trade association, champions high prices, they create an industry fat on easy profits and well-documented opulence.”

And:

  • “The second, bigger point of my article for Congress, employers, and insurers is that regardless how productive pharmaceutical companies are, studies show that 85-89 percent of new drugs provide little or no advantage over existing drugs when measured by clinical improvements.”

Medicynic believes patent reform is one way to deal with the drug cost problem as outlined here and here. We should:

  • “link the length of patents to reasonable pricing. As part of the FDA approval process the proposed price of the new medication would be compared with similar medications already on the market and with the same medication in other countries. The same process that the Canadian patent drug review board uses. If priced a significant amount over the comparator, the patent length would be decreased by some period of time to be determined by the review process–there are many ways such a link could be structured. For unique innovative drugs the cost of development could also be factored into the pricing length of patent equation. Price increases during the duration of the patent would be tied to the rate of inflation. If they exceed that rate the patent length would be proportionally shortened.”


Praying for Health Reform–Christian Scientist silliness

In a world that by nature favors fact over fiction we are showing signs of a nervous breakdown. It’s not enough to be assaulted with a recently retired policitian’s inarticulate ignorance about health care but we also have to deal with the notion of pay for prayer.

  • “She doesn’t see most of the patients she treats. That isn’t necessary, she said, for her prayers to be effective.”
  • “Each prayer is a cerebral search for resolution to the patient’s problem. And the answer often comes in the form of an idea or feeling: “God is here,” “God is life,” “We are created in God’s perfect image.”

Medicynical Note: Is it Christian to charge for prayer? Would you think that prayers that you pay for are more effective than free ones?


The Republican Health Care Plan–ER CARE for all

This from the LA times on a physician’s visit to an ER for suturing a small laceration on his head. The bill, almost $5000 dollars.

Our republican friends say that by unleashing market price competition costs will come down. I’m sympathetic to the concept but it’s highly unlikely that will work in medicine. Consider the patient with a head laceration, is he/she going to shop price?

Consider the opacity and cost:

  • It listed something called “M/S SUPPLY GENERAL,” which came to $1,247. Then there was another $2,425 for “EMERGENCY ROOM GENERAL.” (Medicynic: What does this mean?)
  • $360 for “PREVENTIVE CARE VACCINE,” Medicynic: tetanus booster that cost a buck or two

The doctor in the case wonders:

  • “He has a hard time understanding why there are forces in Washington and elsewhere resisting the overhaul of a system that is built for profit rather than health, costs vastly more per person than systems in other industrialized nations and still shuns “great segments of society.” Medicynic: ME TOO!

Medicynical Note: In my state, Washington, unpaid medical bills total nearly a billion dollars a year. These costs get passed on, one way or another, to the insured–about $917/year. A large portion of these unpaid bills is from unpaid ER bills. With universal coverage, this excess expense goes away and/or is decreased by more efficient management of medical problems by non-emergency room facilities.


Mammograms–How we spend money

The recent recommendation of the United State Preventive Medicine Task Force elicited a violent response from women concerned about “devaluing” human life and the advantage of early diagnosis. Republicans are jumping on the issue complaining it’s rationing and government controls of health care.

Similar recommendations have long been in place for PSA screening in men. The problem in both instances is that the tests (mammograms and PSA) have a high rate of false positives–meaning many people without disease have to have other tests to prove there is no cancer–and a high rate of false negatives, meaning the test doesn’t diagnose all those with cancer. In addition, in younger women these problems are worse and the rate of cancer diagnosed only by mammogram is fleetingly small.

We’ve seen breast cancer in the 40-50 age group. But often the diagnosis is made though finding lump rather than the mammogram. We’ve also often seen people with normal mammograms who later find a lump.

We need some rules and guidelines and an understanding of what our love affair with technology costs.

Yes, I know, how can you put a price on human life but we’ve been doing it for years in the most unfair, least rational way possible, thorough financial rationing.

The republican conservative opposition is at least disingenuous and at worst totally hypocritical. They say we all have access to care through ERs which in case you didn’t know don’t offer mammograms. They’re also suggesting high deductible insurance as another solution. Care to guess what high-deductible means?

American’s delusion is that they can have everything in the way of health care without paying. Mammograms in my view should be considered from age 40 for women with any family history or if they have a strong desire to have the test. It should be a non discretionary part (remember in health care it’s ultimately the patient’s choice) of exams from age 50.

Neither mammograms nor PSA’s are expensive for an individual, compared to other medical procedures. If people really desire such a test and their coverage is inadequate it’s not too much of a burden to pay for it themselves. What should be covered is the follow-up should such testing be suspicious.


Cost Plus in Medicine

In nearby Seattle Swedish Hospital, the largest private hospital system in the area is in a dispute with Regence Blue Cross. Without getting into who’s right or wrong consider the magnitude of rate increases:

  • “According to Regence, Swedish is seeking rate increases totaling 32 percent (Medicynical emphasis) over three years. That’s nearly double the rate increases that it has received in recent years and more than the rate of health-care inflation, said Rachelle Cunningham, a spokeswoman for Regence.”

Medicynical Note: In near depression times health care cost increases march on. Note that while Swedish’s increases are excessive, health care costs are increasing across the board in the range of 10%/year.

Providers are unwilling to become efficient; insurers lack leverage and motivation to control costs; and suppliers (PhARMA and other patent holders) continue to overcharge for their advances. In the end we all pay.


The Best (Non) System in The World

Health care is a business, that’s the way we appear to want it. One of the consequences is that if you don’t have the money you don’t get the care.

There are those who say we provide care through our emergency rooms to anyone who shows. The problem with this is that ER’s don’t provide preventive care, routing examinations, immunizations and early interventions in disease processes.

It also turns out that outcomes of care in ER’s are worse if you don’t have insurance. So the shibbolith that ER care is available to all comes with the modifier that such care is inferior if you can’t pay.

  • “An analysis of 687,091 patients who visited trauma centers nationwide from 2002 to 2006 found that the odds of dying from injuries were almost twice as high for the uninsured than for patients with private insurance, researchers reported in Archives of Surgery.”
  • “uninsured patients often wait longer to see doctors in emergency rooms and sometimes visit ERs at several hospitals before finding one that will treat them. Other studies show that, once they’re admitted, uninsured patients receive fewer services, such as CT and MRI scans, and are less likely to be transferred to a rehabilitation facility.”

Medicynical note; This study simply confirms that our (non) system of health care is number one in costs and inefficiency but not in outcomes.