Category Archives: Ethics

It’s the Money Stupid! (Or Doctors play the lottery)

Medicine over the years has become increasingly entrepreneurial and money driven.  Health care, efficiency and value have become secondary aims  being overshadowed by the quest for money.   In health care, the product you are buying is not usually discretionary, predatory billing is common and an uninformed naive patient can literally lose his shirt.  These patients experiences while extreme are not unique.

Before his three-hour neck surgery for herniated disks in December, Peter Drier, 37, signed a pile of consent forms. A bank technology manager who had researched his insurance coverage, Mr. Drier was prepared when the bills started arriving: $56,000 from Lenox Hill Hospital in Manhattan, $4,300 from the anesthesiologist and even $133,000 from his orthopedist, who he knew would accept a fraction of that fee.

and

Patricia Kaufman’s bills after a recent back operation at a Long Island hospital were rife with such charges, said her husband, Alan, who spent days sorting them out. Two plastic surgeons billed more than $250,000 to sew up the incision, a task done by a resident during previous operations for Ms. Kaufman’s chronic neurological condition.

Read the article for more details.

Medicynical Note:  Medicine is simply following the lead of a deregulated culture that seems to believe that anything  goes and that in time the problem will sort itself out.  In health care that policy has left a trail of people who are “uninsurable”, neglected medical problems, medically related bankruptcies (we lead the world), exploding  costs and a non-sytem of  care whose primary focus is generating revenue. Some drug costs have increased 1000 percent in the past 30-40 years…has your salary kept up? 

The Affordable Care Act is already helping but we should not underestimate the reactionary forces that believe the money driven non-system is the “best in the world.”

Hospital Costs: The ER Visit

We’ve talked about America’s high costs.  One reason is our overuse of ER’s for outpatient care.

The medical mafia makes a big deal about the “sacred” patient doctor relationship.  My experience the past several years is that first, there is nothing sacred going on here and second that the relationship is a somewhat romantic figment of our imagination–it no longer exists.

You realize, of course, that the solo practitioner has gone the way of dinosaurs.  For virtually everyone your family doctor (of one sort or another) is part of a group practice.  When you become ill more often than not you family doc, the guy/gal you have the sacred relationship with, is normally fully booked and you see another practitioner/nurse/physicians’ assistant.  Your doc may or may not even be aware that you have had a problem.  If you are hospitalized your care is turned over to yet another provider, the hospitalist.  Another doctor you have never met.

It’s even worse than implied above.  If you should have an emergency of one sort or another, real or not so real, you are advised to go to  the ER.  That shifts the responsibility for your care elsewhere and quite remarkably escalates our costs to unimaginable levels.  The “sacred” relationship is nowhere to be found.

Elizabeth Rosenthal of the NY Times discusses ER costs here.

A day spent as an inpatient at an American hospital costs on average more than $4,000, five times the charge in many other developed countries, according to the International Federation of Health Plans, a global network of health insurance industries. The most expensive hospitals charge more than $12,500 a day. And at many of them, including California Pacific Medical Center, emergency rooms are profit centers. That is why one of the simplest and oldest medical procedures — closing a wound with a needle and thread — typically leads to bills of at least $1,500 and often much more.

Medicynical Note: Read the article for the gory details.  But it is a fact that hospitals like other players in the health care game have little to no interest in fostering efficiency and cost savings–except to benefit their bottom line.  In regard to patient’s charges, their goal is to maximize them.  They inflate their charges to unimaginable levels then cut deals with high volume insurers.  Should you be uninsured they will  stick you with the full non-discounted amount.  To the little guy it’s as confusing as dealing with a used care dealer (no insult intended) and is nothing more than a legalized scam.  Horrifying as it is, that’s what’s become of my profession and American medicine. 

Health reform while not perfect is a start on rationalizing costs, providing universal coverage, and opening up the mystery of health care costs.

On Healthcare The U.S. is Unique, We’re Number 1….. in the wrong way

The U.S. is the only industrialized country without a national health care insurance scheme for  it’s citizens. We have more uninsured than the rest of the industrialized world combined.  We leads the world in costs by a large margin–it’s not close. And finally we lead the world in bankruptcy from health care related debt.

Meanwhile with the notable exception of the elderly, who are covered by a government program, Medicare. our health statistics are in the middle of the pack so to speak when compared with other industrialized countries.

We seem to have institutionalized a system that assures excellent revenue and incomes for the health industrial complex but costly mediocre outcomes to patients.  We can and should do better.

And When a Medicine (Revlimid) “Works” It’s Unaffordable: $132,000/year, $534/pill

Poignant piece in the NY Times magazine that highlights some of the flaws in our unsustainable health care non-system.  This paragraph outlines the problem

After making more than 70 phone calls to 16 organizations over the past few weeks, I’m still not totally sure what I will owe for my Revlimid, a derivative of thalidomide that is keeping my multiple myeloma in check. The drug is extremely expensive — about $11,000 retail for a four-week supply, $132,000 a year, $524 a pill. Time Warner, my former employer, has covered me for years under its Supplementary Medicare Program, a plan for retirees that included a special Writers Guild benefit capping my out-of-pocket prescription costs at $1,000 a year. That out-of-pocket limit is scheduled to expire on Jan. 1. So what will my Revlimid cost me next year?

Medicynical note:  Anyone believing our non-system is the best in the world should need such drugs.  While  drug companies  spend a great deal to develop medications,  their costs are inflated and overstated.  Efficiency is simply not on their agenda.  Nor is patient well being, access or for that matter outcomes. 

It’s the money stupid!  Charging more than twice the median U.S. income for a single drug that patients in life-threatening situation, any single drug,  is simple blackmail.  It reflects an industry and economy gone mad.

Disabilities Treaty: Voted down by Republicans

Is it any wonder that the world is looking elsewhere for leadership?  155 nations approved this treaty which protects the rights of those with disabilities and which was based on our own Americans with Disabilities act of 22 years ago.  But our Senate sort of voted it down.  38 members opposed, enough to keep the legislation from the necessary 2/3rd majority.

Why, you may ask?

Other conservatives were deeply suspicious of the United Nations, which would oversee treaty obligations. Those who opposed the treaty included former senator and Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, the father of a developmentally disabled child who had traveled to Capitol Hill last week to encourage fellow Republicans to vote no.

He and other conservatives argued that the treaty could relinquish U.S. sovereignty to a U.N. committee charged with overseeing a ban on discrimination and determining how the disabled, including children, should be treated. They particularly worried that the committee could violate the rights of parents who choose to home school their disabled children.

And:

Supporters dismissed those fears as paranoid, noting that the treaty would change nothing in U.S. law without further approval from Congress.

Medicynical Note:  We are so wimpishly paranoid that republicans actually believe that “outsiders” can sneakily  “force” actions on us without our consent.  This  from the “leader” of the free world.

Refused Abortion, Woman Dies: It Could Happen Here!

It’s sad and a bit disconcerting that this happens

“On the Saturday night everything changed, she started experiencing back pain so we called into the hospital, the university hospital.”

He said she continued to experience pain and asked a consultant if she could be induced.

“They said unfortunately she can’t because it’s a Catholic country,” Mr Halappanavar said.

“Savita said to her she is not Catholic, she is Hindu, and why impose the law on her.

“But she said ‘I’m sorry, unfortunately it’s a Catholic country’ and it’s the law that they can’t abort when the foetus is live.”

Medicynical Note:  Medical decisions in pregnancy should be under the complete control of the patient and her doctor.   There is no role in the processes for outsiders, including religious true believers and politicians.

Regarding “freedom of religion” it is enough that a person can apply their own beliefs to their own situation, without forcing the on others.  That is true freedom of religion.

Compounding Pharmacies: Another De/inadequate Regulation Nightmare

Physicians around the country are dealing with a iatrogenic disaster.  281 people with difficult to treat fungal meningitis and 28 deaths so far.  This was a completely preventable and unnecessary complication of our  belief that we need less regulation and the ill fated notion that less regulation=freedom.  In this case that freedom is literally killing people.

The problem is that a large compounding pharmacy in Massachusetts marketed a a contaminated drug used to treat problems with spinal joints.  The fungal contamination then apparently entered the spinal canal causing the meningitis for which there a limited and relatively ineffective treatments.

There is been a long history of conflict between the FDA and compounding pharmacies.

The deadly meningitis outbreak linked to contaminated pain injections has prompted calls for tighter federal regulation of compounding pharmacies, which have periodically been blamed for crippling and sometimes fatal injuries. But this isn’t the first time Congress has pushed for more authority over the industry.

Such efforts stretch back to the 1990s, and after vigorous pushback by compounding pharmacists, they have left a patchwork of incomplete, overlapping laws, contradictory court rulings and overall uncertainty about how much power the Food and Drug Administration has to regulate compounders.

And:

The International Academy of Compounding Pharmacists has spent more than $1 million lobbying Congress in the past decade and has a track record of defeating measures opposed by the industry. A 2003 provision to set up an FDA advisory committee to oversee compounders was killed by then-House Majority Leader Tom Delay, (medicynical emphasis) who said it would createunnecessary federal interference. Delay represented Sugar Land, Texas, the headquarters of the compounding academy.

Medicynical Note:  These cases of meningitis signal a failure of regulation.  Responsibility lies with the companies involved, those procuring substandard drugs, congress, the courts and ultimately the FDA.

This brings to mind the medicynical contention that we have a non-system of health care but do have a medical industrial complex that is better at generating revenue than caring for people.  

American exceptionalism has led us down the path of the most expensive, most inefficient and perhaps the most error prone health care in the industrialized world.  

The Emperor’s Clothes–U.S. vs Canada Health Care

The following links  compare our non-system of health care with the national health program of Canada.

It’s a stark contrast and  explains why so many American are forced into bankruptcy by health care expenses.

This talks a bit about the costs of having a baby in the U.S.  even if you have “good” insurance–several thousand dollars.

As opposed to Canada where the total medical cost of childbearing appears to be  $25.  The interviews in this article also highlight the satisfaction of Canadians with their system of health care.

 

The Medical Industrial Complex: It’s the Money Stupid!

In health care, we’ve developed a system of money making that’s unprecedented.  What once was a profession that at least gave lip service to patients and health care–remember the “sacred patient doctor relationship?” or the “ethical” pharmaceutical industry?–has evolved into a money grubbing borderline ethical business.

Gaming the billing system has become the norm.  When our local “non-profit” hospital (run by a Catholic hospital conglomerate) bought out medical practices in our area, costs dramatically increased.  Coding for visits moved to more expensive levels.  The hospital  billed an additional facility fee even while the practices remained in the same location as before.   Procedures previously done out of the hospital were moved into their facility.  Instead of finding ways to provide efficient economical care, providers (and suppliers) even so-called non-profits seek to maximize revenue.  This is happening at every level of our health care mess and is one of the major causes of our  ridiculous cost inflation over the past 20 years.

More on gaming our non-system here:

Between 2001 and 2010, doctors increasingly moved to higher-paying codes for billing Medicare for office visits while cutting back on lower-paying ones, according to a year-long examination of about 362 million claims. In 2001, the two highest codes were listed on about 25 percent of the doctor-visit claims; in 2010, they were on 40 percent.

 

 

Conflicts of Interest in Genetic Counseling?

Being on the payroll of a company that pays commissions (kickbacks—medicynical observation)  for more business sounds at least unethical in a medical practice.  If the service provided is more than a person needs and if the relationship with the company is not fully revealed,  it could be criminal.  Something out of a HBO crime  family show?  No it’s simply the way genetic testing is encouraged in the U.S.

Now, as the number of tests and the money to be made from them are exploding, another question is being asked by professionals in the field themselves. Is it ethical for genetic counselors, who advise patients on whether to undergo testing, to be paid by the companies that perform the tests?

While it might not always be immediately obvious to patients, some counselors offering them advice in hospitals and doctors’ offices work for the commercial genetic testing companies, not for the hospitals or doctors themselves.

The testing companies appear to have business arrangements with hospitals and practices that recommend the use of the company’s counselors and product.  They and/or the counselor often  pay for office space in the facilities, to facilitate access to patients.   The counselors get paid more for an increased volume of testing.  When the full details of the arrangement is known the conflict of interest is quite likely to be worse.

For example, are the counselors full employees with benefits from the testing company or are they contractors?  If they are contractors than the extra payments for increased volume have more the flavor of a kickback than a “bonus” to an employee for good service.  In either case, the arrangement borders, in my view, on being unethical particularly if the relationship between the counselor, testing company, doctor and hospital is unclear.

Medicynical Note:  A cleaner way of doing this would be to have a completely separate office/facility for the genetic counselor with the relationship between the facilities clearly and understandably spelled out.